Jesus Christ and Functionalist and Conflict Theory Essay

Jesus Christ sought to improve the individual, the component of society, and as result, his teaching ideally aims to advance the well-being of society as a whole. The four Gospels and the book of Acts thoroughly demonstrate the extensive sociological knowledge that was present in Jesus’ teaching. His message facilitates personal reform, rather than change in the social structure alone. Although Jesus establishes the church as a social institution, he does so, only after a number of individuals become his followers. Jesus teaches that society should be orderly. In order to understand his approach, one must first understand the functionalist theory. He conveys his message with a common language that is appropriate to the situation,†¦show more content†¦Although one may claim Jesus was a strict functionalist, his focus was more on the divine order, expressed in unity, love, communion, and oneness, rather than a caste-like system. By eradicating the individual personal ills that damage society, Jesus helped increase the body of knowledge that promotes societal harmony. His main opposition was from the Pharisees, Sadducees, teachers of the Law of Moses, and the Chief Priests, who mistook his efforts of teaching the people as a threat to their prestigious social positions. The class disparity is evident pervasively throughout the four gospels and Acts, a vivid example being the death of John the Baptist whom Herod beheaded. When John spoke out against Herod’s immoral behavior, Herod used his higher social position and authority to suppress John’s voice and as a result murdered him. John’s limited social mobility and high status consistency forced him to suffer the consequences of his actions, while Herod’s murder went unpunished by the Roman officials. Social position therefore played a significant role in influencing the lives of ordinary individuals living in the New Testament times. The various symbols Jesus employs in his preaching reflect the common lives of most of his hearers. The agrarian and pastoral themes were especially popular, because many Israelites were farmers and shepherds. Most of Jesus’ parables andShow MoreRelatedBirmingham Jail Functional Theory1638 Words   |  7 PagesBirmingham Jail† shows the way of nonviolent adjustment of the social conflict and stages of this way: â€Å"collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist negotiation; self-purification; and direct action† (MLK np.). Martin Luther King was the first person in western history to show that you can achieve change without going into violent measures. While taking a sociological viewpoint and following two of its major theories. It is conceivable to say that King’s method of nonviolent directRead MoreSociologial Analysis of Christmas844 Words   |  4 PagesTITLE- SOCIOLOGIAL ANALYSIS OF CHRISTMAS In this paper I will discuss Social Theories such as Structural Functionalism, Conflict theory; with emphasis on Karl Marx’s early work and how it relates to the conflict theory and Symbolic interaction. I intend to define and discuss relevant sociological terms of these theories and how these theories could apply to my favorite holiday which is Christmas. Structural Functionalism as defined by Functionolists such as Auguste Comte and Herbert SpencerRead MoreThe Role Of The Macro Micro Continuum Essay1325 Words   |  6 Pageslove, due to my Christianity. My endeavor to be Christ-like is in a constant state of progress. Some days are filled with success and others failure. My behavior is an unequivocal result of my attitude; if Christ is at the vanguard of my mind my behavior is honorable. The moment my motivations become focused on my perceptions of life, not looking through the lenses of Jesus, my behavior is less than admirable. Lastly, my willing endeavor to be Christ-like has given me the ability to succeed in life;Read MoreReligion Is A Social Institution Essay1378 Words   |  6 Pagessacred and profane in different ways. A functionalist perspective focuses less on what religion is and more on what religion does, with a particular importance and how it contributes to social order. Religion does not need to have gods or goddess, or an afterlife, because almost any social practice that strongly unites people and has a strong following, such as being a sports fan can have the same function as a religion. Emile Durkheim defined this functionalist approach with three focuses. First, itRead MoreThe Role of Religion as a Conservative Force and as an Indicator of Change2079 Words   |  9 Pagesfeel part of a larger Christian community. Durkheim strongly believed that the worship of god symbolised the worship of society – god and society are the same thing. This idea has been developed into a theory of civil religion by other functionalist thinkers. Shills and Young argue that it is difficult to separate national identities from religious identities. We can particularly see this in Islamic societies in which every aspect of social, cultural, politicalRead MoreWomen Are More Religious Than Men2080 Words   |  9 Pagesof senior or sole ordained leaders in the church. A study done by the National Congregation shows the numbers are highest, yet still drastically lower than the statistics of men, in Unitarian Universalist Association at 30% and the United Church of Christ being at 25%. The lowest numbers seen are within the Southern Baptist Convention with 4% and the Free Methodist Church at 1%. This is because women have been notoriously considered as â€Å"objects of men’s curiosity, manipulation, or enjoyment, not asRead MoreEth 125 Quiz2636 Words   |  11 PagesFinal Exam-ETH/125 Multiple Choice (65 questions – 100 points total possible) Choose the most correct answer. Where there is a conflict, the text is the final source. Please write letter next to number. Part A: (Weeks 1 -3 ) ___D__1 .A subordinate group whose members have significantly less control or power over their own lives than do the members of a dominant group are called a: a. Ethnic group b. Racial group c. Majority group d. Minority group _D___2 Which of the followingRead MoreSocial Institution3293 Words   |  14 Pagesfor the individual †¢ Act as agencies of coordination and stability for the total culture †¢ Tend to control behavior Functionalists: †¢ Social institutions exist because they meet universal needs. †¢ The major task of society is its survival: – Replacing members – Socializing new members – Producing/distributing goods and services – Preserving order – Providing sense of purpose Conflict theorists: †¢ View social institutions as the primary means by which the elite maintains its privileged position †¢ ThroughRead MoreThe Censorship of Art Essay example14698 Words   |  59 Pageson rock records (Walker 1987:1). In 1986, two evangelists are reported to have claimed, during a record and tape burning in West Virginia, that the Mr. Ed television theme song had satanic backwordings (also, AC/DC is supposed to stand for Anti-Christ/Devil’s Children, and KISS for Kids In Satan’s Service, see Wishnia 1987:445). Cardinal O’Connor of New York condemned heavy metal for its satanist references (Adler et al. 1990:57). Science and the Study of Music Censorship Professors (and

Marketing Plan for the Nanoholder Case Study Example

Essays on Marketing Plan for the Nanoholder Case Study The paper "Marketing Plan for the Nanoholder" is a perfect example of a case study on marketing. Madison Inc is a fictitious company involved in developing and marketing a number of utility products in the market. The firm has entered into agreements with other firms to distribute and market a number of gadgets among them game consoles from Microsoft and Sony, video games, board games, toys, among others. The company also manufactures and markets artificial leather and plastic sheaths for a range of mobile phones and other handheld devices. The â€Å"Nano holder† is the latest addition to the company’s product portfolio. The Nanoholder is a modified watchstrap that is tied around the wrist and the iPod nano is attached.2.0 InnovationInnovation is a key element in marketing for modern companies. The innovation introduces a new product in the company portfolio but also implies new ways of strategic marketing and thinking. Ferguson and Ferguson (1994) write that manufactur ers of technologic gadgets can expect greater returns as they expect the new innovation and advancement on their existing products to foster their competitiveness. Firms have therefore to safeguard their technology from falling in the hands of competitors and in the process enjoy abnormal profits for longer. Varey (2002) says that fundamental innovation is responsible for meeting latent demand. The author cites the first introduction of microcomputers by Apple Inc as a good example of fundamental innovation. However, in this case, the introduction of the watch strap as a holder for the iPod nano is just a functional innovation since it is a change of use rather than a new product that never existed before. Incremental innovation has seen the introduction of better versions of the original iPod. The recent iPod nano has created an opportunity for fundamental innovation with the watchstrap for the nano.New products/innovations require intensive marketing for them to succeed. â€Å"In a 1991 survey of new product development, Product Development and Management Association (PDMA) found that for every 11 serious ideas or concepts, three enter development, 1.3 are launched and one succeeds† (Davis, n.d., p. 18). With these types of odds, marketing becomes about differentiating between items that succeed and those that do not. To be successful, the nano holder must stand out amongst all the others. It must meet the needs and wants of the customer. The product should be available and easy to obtain. The price must be competitive and accurately priced.  Finally, to be successful the product must be distinguishable from all the others that are available in the market. As a well-known brand in the market, the company must maintain existing customer relationships and remain devoted to creating a new one with improved features (Curtis 2008). The firm will need to continuously improve the product based on customer feedback. These are all parts of the marketing stra tegy.

Corporate Law Financial Statements

Question: Discuss about teCorporate Lawfor Financial Statements. Answer: Explanation of How a Partner can be sued from the Operations of the Partnership Partnership is a business that involves two or more partners to share the business operations together with the share in profitability and liabilities. Partnership business is conducted as per the regulation of Partnership Act and Corporate Law of Australiathat regulates profit sharing, partners liability along with the recognition criteria for the purpose of preparing financial statements and taxable income (Austlii.edu.au. 2017). The business of partnership is conducted as per the consent between the partners as well as according to the partnership deed in compliance with the principles of Partnership Act. Accordingly, the regulations of Partnership Act also provide liability of the partners which is considerably large as all the partners in partnership business are jointly and severally liable. As per the principles of section 10 under Partnership Act, partners are liable for any wrongful activities or omission of activities of partner during the ordinary course of business that c auses loss or injury to the firm as well as to the other partners (Hurt 2015). The ordinary course of business has been clarified by considering the decided case of Polkinghome v Holland (1934) 51 CLR 143 that provides the identification of the nature as well as on the scope of the partnership business. Accordingly, section 10/11 provides that the liability of the partners incorporate misapplication or misutilization of money or misapplication of property then the partner can be sued from the business operations. In case of Mann v Hulme (1961) 35 ALJR 153, the issue involved was making investments in the firm therefore prepared a will assuring the safety of the investments. However, it was found within the firm that the partners misused the funds received by continuing the solicitor practice within the partnership firm (Rubin, Whiteway and Finkelstein 2014). Observing the facts of the case and regulations of Partnership Act, the partner was held liable for misapplication of money. Further, a partner can be sued under the partnership liability if the partner fails to maintain proper records of accounting for the purpose of taxation system or if the partner fails to operate the business assets as per the agreed shareholding, referring to the case of Bowman v Bacon (1897) 18 LR (NSW) 1 2 (Amankwah-Amoah and Debrah 2016). In addition, liability of the partner extends to the outsiders that is liability to the clients and government that incorporates liabilities with respect to the debts or obligations. The regulation of Partnership Act provides that if a partner contravenes the requirements of section 9/10/11 of Partnership Act or fails to act in a good faith to pay off the debts or liabilities as per the contract, then the partner can be sued (Siffert et al. 2015). Moreover, if the partner misapplies the money or property or any other receipt of investment money from the clients, then the client is entitled to sue the accused partner from the operations of business. In case of Ingot Capital Investments Pty Ltd v Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Ltd (2007) NSWSC 124, court held that the firms partner conducted wrongful transactions resulted in loss to the client as well as to the firm hence, the partner was sued from the business operations (Austlii.edu.au. 2017). Corporate Liability and Legal Actions Corporate Liability Pizza Plus Pty Ltd can be Exposed Because of Bettys Actions According to the regulations of Corporation Law, limited companies are exposed to the liabilities as per the value of the shares held by the members of the company. However, in case the company is private limited company having one director, the company will be exposed to certain liabilities if the actions of member cause loss or injury to the clients or consumers. The director of the company owes fiduciary liability to the consumers in terms of causing serious injury to the consumers. Further, failure of director to act as per the requirements of the Corporations Act together with the actions of shareholders exposes the directors as well as the company with the liability of fiduciary duties and statutory duties (Austlii.edu.au. 2017). The given case states that the actions of Betty in terms of pizza delivery by drone used by Pizza Plus Pty Ltd caused serious injury to its consumer due to the fall of drone during the service. Accordingly, Pizza Pty Ltd would be exposed under the corporate liability of fiduciary obligations and statutory duties since Betty has been a member provided secret information of her company Dominos. Similar to the case of Andar Transport Pty Ltd v Brambles Ltd (2004) 28, the company as well as the director of the accused held liable under fiduciary obligations since it caused serious injury to the plaintiff due to the actions of its shareholders. Further, Pizza Plus Pty Ltd would be exposed to the corporate liability with respect to the Contractual Liability since directors is personally liable for the injury caused by the services provided by the company. Contractual liability would be imposed on Will as a director since he is the only director of the company and was responsible for the ne w service conducted to deliver pizza to the consumers (Jones 2015). The injury caused to Jill involved proceedings under Personal Injuries Act as the service incorporate by Pizza Plus Pty Ltd falls under the act of negligence, which is similar to the case of Rainham Chemical Works Ltd v Belvedere Fish Guano Co. Ltd (1921) 2 AC 465. In addition, Pizza Plus Pty Ltd would be exposed to the statutory liability due to the actions of Betty, companys shareholder and a director of Dominos Australia Ltd. It has been mentioned that Betty entered into unlawful actions by providing the secret details of Dominos to Will; therefore, the company will be exposed to the statutory liability as it is illegal to ascertain secret details of other company. In case of Hamilton v Whitehead (1988) 166 CLR 121, court held that the defendant held liable under statutory liability since the services availed by the person caused serious injury to the plaintiff which was copied illegally from other sources. Accordingly, Pizza Plus Pty Ltd would be exposed to statutory liability together with the other liabilities under Corporations Act (Beale 2016). Legal Actions and Explanation of Areas of Law that may be Involved As the business services provided by Pizza Plus Pty Ltd caused serious injury to the consumer, Jill, he is entitled to take legal actions against the company as well as against the Will since he is the only director in the company. Other than the exposure of corporate liability, Pizza Plus would be exposed under the regulations of Australian Consumer Law (ACL) that associates with the consumers rights and obligation (Austlii.edu.au. 2017). The given situation states that the delivery services provided by Wills company Pizza Plus that included delivery of Pizza by using drones which fell on the head of Jill and caused serious injury. Therefore, Jill is entitled to take legal actions against Pizza Plus under the regulations of Australian Consumer Law against consumer guarantees applicable to the business services. It is essential for the business organizations to provide the services with due care and skills and within the reasonable time. Accordingly, Jill can take legal actions under personal injury and sue the company together with the claim on compensation charges for the injuries that caused as a result of services problems (Leenders and Gabbay 2013). Similar to the case of Andar Transport Pty Ltd v Brambles Limited, liability on the defendant imposed under common law since defendant for lack of reasonable care and consumers protection through the business services. In the present case, services of Pizza Plus caused injury to Jill that incorporates the regulations under corporate law as well as Consumer law with respect to the rights and obligations for consumers. Corporate law incorporate legal actions against the personal injury to the consumers due to the personal injury including the fiduciary liability for providing negligent service to the consumers. Moreover, the present situation also involves the liability under common law for not considering due care and skills to provide the delivery services of pizza to the consumers. It has been observed that Pizza Plus contravened the regulations of Corporations Act together with the Consumer Act for not complying the services in consideration with the safety of the consumers. Similar to the case of Briggs v James Hardie (1989) 16 NSWLR 549 in which court held that there was no clear and unambiguous doctrine present and harmed the clients, hence the company held liable under corporate law (Austlii. edu.au. 2017). Further, regulations of Consumer Law would be applied on Pizza Plus since the company contravened the principle on considering consumer guarantee with respect to maintain the quality that caused significant loss to the consumers. Therefore, Jill has the right to take actions against Pizza Plus Pty Ltd under corporate law for contravention of principles in terms of personal injury, contractual liability while legal action under consumer law in terms of consumer obligations. Reference List Amankwah-Amoah, J. and Debrah, Y.A., 2016. Toward a construct of liability of origin.Industrial and Corporate Change, p.dtw021. Austlii.edu.au. 2017.Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII). [online] Available at: https://www.austlii.edu.au/ [Accessed 1 Feb. 2017]. Beale, S.S., 2016. The Development and Evolution of the US Law of Corporate Criminal Liability and the Yates Memo.Stetson L. Rev.,46, p.41. Hurt, C., 2015. The Limited Liability Partnership in Bankruptcy.Am. Bankr. LJ,89, p.567 Jones, M.R., 2015. The Alien Tort Statute and Corporate Liability: Rebutting the Extraterritorial Presumption Post-Kiobel.Ga. St. UL Rev.,32, p.699. Leenders, R.T.A. and Gabbay, S.M. eds., 2013.Corporate social capital and liability. Springer Science Business Media. Rubin, B.D., Whiteway, A.M. and Finkelstein, J.G., 2014. Proposed Partnership Liability Allocation Regulations: An Unworkable Solution in Search of a Problem.J. Passthrough Entities,17, p.31. Siffert, J.S., Rakoff, J.S., Reiss, S.A., Loughlin, W.P. and Allen, S.W., 2015. Corporations and Corporate Liability.Modern Federal Jury Instructions-Civil,4.